Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without Defibrillator in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Evidence Synthesis and Clinical Implications from DECIDE-CRT and Related Studies
The DECIDE-CRT nationwide cohort study found no statistically significant survival advantage of adding a defibrillator (CRT-D) over CRT pacing alone (CRT-P) in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) over 5 years.
Meta-analyses and randomized trial subanalyses show mixed results—with some evidence suggesting CRT-D reduces all-cause mortality especially in younger NICM patients, though benefits attenuate in older populations.
Emerging risk stratification tools, including cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scar imaging and periodic repolarization dynamics (PRD), help identify NICM patients more likely to benefit from ICD therapy.
Sex-specific and etiology-dependent differences affect arrhythmic risk and device efficacy, underscoring personalized approaches in device selection for NICM patients.