PAXG Challenges mFOLFIRINOX as the New Standard for Preoperative Pancreatic Cancer Care: Insights from the CASSANDRA Trial

PAXG Challenges mFOLFIRINOX as the New Standard for Preoperative Pancreatic Cancer Care: Insights from the CASSANDRA Trial

Highlights of the CASSANDRA Trial

The PACT-21 CASSANDRA trial represents a significant milestone in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The primary highlights of the first randomization analysis include:

1. Survival Advantage: Preoperative PAXG demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in median event-free survival (EFS) compared to mFOLFIRINOX (16.0 months vs. 10.2 months), representing a 37% reduction in the risk of progression or death.

2. Potent Efficacy: The hazard ratio of 0.63 underscores the superiority of the four-drug cisplatin-based combination over the current standard-of-care triplet, mFOLFIRINOX.

3. Feasibility and Safety: Despite the intensity of both regimens, the safety profiles were manageable, with grade 3 or higher adverse events occurring at similar rates between the two groups.

4. New Comparator Standard: Based on these findings, PAXG is proposed as a new reference standard for future clinical trials involving neoadjuvant therapy for resectable and borderline resectable PDAC.

Background: The Evolution of Neoadjuvant Therapy in PDAC

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most challenging malignancies in clinical oncology, characterized by early systemic dissemination and a high rate of local recurrence even after successful surgical resection. Historically, the treatment paradigm focused on upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the high frequency of positive surgical margins (R1 resections) and the inability of many patients to receive adjuvant therapy due to postoperative complications led to a shift toward preoperative, or neoadjuvant, strategies.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy aims to downstage the primary tumor, increase the rate of R0 resections, and address micrometastatic disease earlier in the treatment course. For years, modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) has been considered the gold standard in this setting based on its efficacy in the metastatic and adjuvant landscapes. Despite its widespread use, the search for more effective regimens continues. The PAXG regimen—a combination of cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, and gemcitabine—was developed to leverage the synergistic mechanisms of platinum agents, taxanes, and antimetabolites to overcome the dense stroma and chemoresistance characteristic of PDAC.

CASSANDRA Study Design and Methodology

The CASSANDRA trial (PACT-21) is a randomized, open-label, 2×2 factorial phase 3 trial conducted across 17 academic hospitals in Italy. The study targeted a specific and high-risk population: patients aged 18 to 75 years with pathologically confirmed resectable or borderline resectable PDAC (Stages I-III).

Patient Randomization and Stratification

Patients were randomized 1:1 using a central web-based system. Stratification factors included the participating center and baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels. The trial utilized a unique factorial design. In the first randomization, patients received either four months of PAXG or four months of mFOLFIRINOX. A second randomization subsequently determined whether patients received an additional two months of chemotherapy before or after surgery.

Dosing and Administration

The PAXG regimen consisted of intravenous cisplatin (30 mg/m2), nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2), and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) administered every 14 days, combined with oral capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 daily, divided into two doses). The mFOLFIRINOX regimen followed the standard protocol: intravenous fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion), leucovorin (400 mg/m2), irinotecan (150 mg/m2), and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every 14 days.

Study Endpoints

The primary endpoint for this first randomization analysis was event-free survival (EFS) in the intention-to-treat population. EFS was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (preventing surgery), local or distant recurrence after surgery, or death from any cause.

Key Findings: A Paradigm Shift in Efficacy

The analysis included 260 eligible patients randomized between late 2020 and early 2024. The baseline characteristics, including age (median 63-65 years) and sex distribution, were well-balanced between the two arms.

Superior Event-Free Survival

The results of the CASSANDRA trial provide compelling evidence for the superiority of PAXG. The median EFS was 16.0 months (95% CI 12.4–19.8) in the PAXG group, compared to 10.2 months (95% CI 8.6–13.5) in the mFOLFIRINOX group. This absolute difference of nearly six months is clinically profound in the context of pancreatic cancer. The calculated hazard ratio (HR) was 0.63 (95% CI 0.47–0.84), with a highly significant p-value of 0.0018.

Impact on Surgical Outcomes

While the full analysis of surgical resection rates and R0 margins is integrated into the long-term trial results, the significant extension in EFS suggests that the PAXG regimen is more effective at maintaining disease control during the critical preoperative period. This allows a higher proportion of patients to proceed to surgery without the early progression often seen with less intensive regimens.

Secondary Outcomes and Ongoing Analysis

The trial reached its necessary events for the primary EFS analysis. However, follow-up for overall survival (OS) is still ongoing. Given the strong correlation between EFS and OS in pancreatic cancer, there is high anticipation that the OS data will mirror the EFS benefit observed here.

Safety and Tolerability Profiles

The use of four-drug chemotherapy combinations naturally raises concerns regarding toxicity. The CASSANDRA trial monitored adverse events (AEs) closely in all patients who received at least one dose of therapy.

At least one grade 3 or worse adverse event was observed in 66% of patients in the PAXG group and 61% in the mFOLFIRINOX group. The slightly higher incidence in the PAXG group was not statistically significant, suggesting that the four-drug combination does not disproportionately increase the safety burden compared to the three-drug mFOLFIRINOX triplet. Common high-grade toxicities included hematological events (neutropenia, anemia) and gastrointestinal disturbances, which are typical for these regimens and were managed through standard supportive care and dose modifications. One fatal event was reported in the mFOLFIRINOX group, highlighting the inherent risks of intensive chemotherapy in this patient population.

Expert Commentary and Clinical Interpretation

The CASSANDRA trial results are poised to disrupt the current treatment landscape for resectable PDAC. For years, mFOLFIRINOX has been the undisputed leader in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. However, the 5.8-month improvement in median EFS provided by PAXG cannot be ignored. The biological plausibility of PAXG’s success likely lies in its multi-pathway inhibition. By combining the DNA-damaging effects of cisplatin with the stroma-disrupting properties of nab-paclitaxel and the antimetabolite actions of gemcitabine and capecitabine, PAXG addresses the heterogeneity of pancreatic tumors more effectively than fluorouracil-based triplets.

Clinicians must, however, consider the generalizability of these results. The study was conducted in Italian academic centers with high expertise in managing complex chemotherapy protocols. In community settings, the intensive monitoring required for a four-drug regimen like PAXG may be more challenging. Furthermore, the 2×2 factorial design means that the final interpretation will depend on the results of the second randomization (timing of additional chemotherapy), though the EFS benefit of the initial PAXG induction is robust.

Current guidelines may soon reflect these findings, potentially recommending PAXG as a preferred neoadjuvant option for patients with good performance status. Additionally, PAXG should now be considered the benchmark against which new investigative agents or immunotherapy combinations are compared in future phase 3 trials.

Summary and Conclusion

In conclusion, the CASSANDRA trial demonstrates that preoperative PAXG is superior to mFOLFIRINOX in extending event-free survival for patients with stage I-III resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. With a median EFS of 16.0 months and a manageable safety profile, PAXG offers a significant advancement in neoadjuvant care. These findings suggest that the clinical community should consider PAXG as a new standard preoperative option, providing a stronger foundation for curative-intent surgery and long-term survival in one of medicine’s most difficult-to-treat cancers.

Funding and Clinical Registry

The PACT-21 CASSANDRA trial was funded by MyEverest and Codice Viola. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04793932) and EudraCT (2020-003080-26 and 2024-519031-42-00).

References

1. Reni M, Macchini M, Orsi G, et al. Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX versus PAXG for stage I-III resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PACT-21 CASSANDRA): results of the first randomisation analysis of a randomised, open-label, 2×2 factorial phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2026;406(10522):2945-2956. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01685-X.

2. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(25):2395-2406.

3. Versteijne E, Vogel JA, Besselink MG, et al. Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(16):1763-1773.

术前PAXG在可切除和边缘可切除胰腺癌中的无事件生存期优于mFOLFIRINOX:PACT-21 CASSANDRA首次随机化结果

术前PAXG在可切除和边缘可切除胰腺癌中的无事件生存期优于mFOLFIRINOX:PACT-21 CASSANDRA首次随机化结果

亮点

– 在随机、开放标签、3期PACT-21 CASSANDRA试验中,术前PAXG(顺铂、白蛋白结合型紫杉醇、卡培他滨、吉西他滨)将中位无事件生存期(EFS)延长至16.0个月,而mFOLFIRINOX为10.2个月(HR 0.63;95% CI 0.47–0.84;p=0.0018)。

– 两个治疗组中,3级或更高级别的不良事件发生率较高(PAXG组为66%,mFOLFIRINOX组为61%);发生了一例治疗相关死亡。所有260名随机患者至少接受了一个周期的治疗。

– 研究人员得出结论,在等待总生存期和更长期随访数据的情况下,术前PAXG可以考虑作为可切除和边缘可切除胰腺导管腺癌的标准治疗选择。

背景和疾病负担

胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)仍然是最致命的实体恶性肿瘤之一。即使在解剖学上可切除或边缘可切除的患者中,手术后的复发率也很高,长期生存有限。围手术期和辅助系统疗法旨在治疗微转移病灶,提高阴性切缘(R0)切除率,并延长无病生存期和总生存期。

辅助改良FOLFIRINOX(mFOLFIRINOX)在PRODIGE-24试验中显示出比吉西他滨更好的总生存期获益,并已在具有良好表现状态的适当患者中广泛采用。新辅助策略在可切除或边缘可切除的PDAC中越来越受欢迎,用于患者选择、早期全身控制和增加R0切除率(例如,PREOPANC和其他试验)。其他方案是否能提供优于mFOLFIRINOX的更好围手术期结局仍是一个开放的问题。

研究设计

PACT-21 CASSANDRA试验是一项在意大利17个学术中心进行的随机、开放标签、2 × 2析因3期研究。符合条件的患者年龄为18-75岁,病理确诊为可切除或边缘可切除的PDAC(临床分期I-III)。

初始随机化为1:1,分配到两种术前化疗方案之一,持续四个月:

  • PAXG:卡培他滨每日总量1250 mg/m²(每日两次各625 mg/m²),联合静脉注射顺铂30 mg/m²、白蛋白结合型紫杉醇150 mg/m²和吉西他滨800 mg/m²,每14天一次;
  • mFOLFIRINOX:静脉注射氟尿嘧啶2400 mg/m²(连续输注)、亚叶酸钙400 mg/m²、伊立替康150 mg/m²和奥沙利铂85 mg/m²,每14天一次。

在最初的四个月后,参与者进行了第二次随机化(单独报告),接受2个月的额外化疗,分别在手术前或手术后进行。第一次随机化的主要终点是意向治疗人群的无事件生存期(EFS)。安全性分析包括所有至少接受一次治疗的患者。

关键发现

从2020年11月3日至2024年4月24日,共有260名符合条件的患者被随机分组:132名分配到PAXG组,128名分配到mFOLFIRINOX组。基线特征平衡良好;PAXG组的中位年龄为65岁(IQR 60-70),mFOLFIRINOX组为63岁(IQR 57-69),性别分布相似。

主要结局:无事件生存期

PAXG显著改善了中位EFS,与mFOLFIRINOX相比:

– 中位EFS:PAXG组为16.0个月(95% CI 12.4–19.8),mFOLFIRINOX组为10.2个月(95% CI 8.6–13.5)。

– 事件风险比(PAXG vs mFOLFIRINOX):0.63(95% CI 0.47–0.84);p = 0.0018。

这种程度的风险降低在以治愈为目的的人群中具有临床意义,表明PAXG在术前阶段具有更好的早期疾病控制效果。

安全性和耐受性

两种方案的毒性均较大,反映了新辅助治疗的强度和患者群体的特点。PAXG组132名患者中有87名(66%)和mFOLFIRINOX组128名患者中有78名(61%)发生了至少一次3级或更高级别的不良事件。有一例致命的不良事件报告(提供的摘要中未指定归因)。

关键的实际考虑包括需要积极的支持性护理(止吐药、必要时使用生长因子支持、顺铂的水化和肾功能监测、铂类和紫杉烷暴露的神经病变监测以及密切管理细胞减少症)。

其他结局和程序数据

已发布的摘要重点介绍了第一次随机化的EFS分析和安全性。关于重要次要终点的详细信息(如R0切除率、病理反应、术后发病率和死亡率、手术时间、完成手术的患者数量和生活质量措施)未包含在提供的摘要中,当完整结果可用时,这些信息将非常重要。总生存期随访正在进行中。

专家评论和背景解读

这些随机3期数据值得注意,因为它们直接比较了两种多药、高强度的新辅助方案在围手术期PDAC患者中的应用。优势包括多中心入组、按中心和CA19-9分层随机化、意向治疗分析、事件驱动的主要终点达成和完成入组。

解释时应权衡几个注意事项。首先,该试验是开放标签的,这在化疗比较中很常见,但可能会引入治疗后的管理偏倚。其次,EFS是一个重要的近端终点,但不能等同于总生存期;总生存期结果有待公布。第三,两组的毒性都较高——将试验中的耐受性转化为现实世界实践(尤其是在75岁以上患者和非学术中心之外)可能具有挑战性。

生物学合理性:PAXG结合了铂类药物(顺铂)、紫杉烷类(白蛋白结合型紫杉醇)、吉西他滨(PDAC中的常用药物)和卡培他滨(一种氟嘧啶前药)。这种组合施加了多机制的细胞毒性压力,可能增加早期系统控制和肿瘤缩小,从而解释更高的EFS。mFOLFIRINOX本身是一种强大的多药方案(氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康、奥沙利铂),并在PRODIGE-24中建立了辅助治疗的地位(Conroy等人,《新英格兰医学杂志》2018)。EFS的优越性是否会转化为OS优势取决于多种因素,包括围手术期死亡率、辅助治疗选择和复发模式。

局限性和剩余问题

  • 总生存期数据不成熟;总生存期将决定EFS获益是否转化为生存优势。
  • 详细的手术结局(切除率、R0切缘状态、术后并发症)和患者报告的结局对于评估净临床获益是必要的。
  • 试验人群限于年龄≤75岁,并在17个意大利学术中心进行;对老年患者和非学术环境的推广需要确认。
  • 开放标签设计和提供的摘要中缺乏中央放射学/外科审查可能会引入评估变异性。
  • 基于生物标志物的患者选择(如同源重组缺陷、BRCA状态、基线CA19-9动力学)未在此报告,可能识别出获益最大的亚组。

临床意义和实践整合

如果后续的总生存期和手术结局证实了EFS结果,PAXG可以作为适合患者的可切除或边缘可切除PDAC的标准新辅助治疗选项。目前,临床医生应权衡潜在的EFS优势与毒性特征、中心在提供复杂多药化疗方面的经验以及患者偏好。

在等待完整数据集时的关键实际建议:

  • 在多学科讨论中讨论这两种方案,包括外科医生、内科肿瘤学家、放射肿瘤学家和支持性护理团队。
  • 仔细筛查患者合并症(顺铂的肾功能、神经病变风险、表现状态),并尽可能提供积极的支持性护理措施以维持剂量强度。
  • 将符合条件的患者纳入正在进行的试验或登记研究,以收集真实世界证据和生物标志物数据。

研究优先事项

重要的下一步包括完成总生存期分析,报告手术和病理结局,以及生活质量数据。前瞻性生物标志物研究(BRCA/HRD状态、循环肿瘤DNA动态和CA19-9动力学)可以完善PAXG与mFOLFIRINOX的选择。在老年人或虚弱人群中进行比较有效性研究,以及与放疗或新型靶向/免疫治疗药物的联合使用,是合乎逻辑的未来方向。

结论

PACT-21 CASSANDRA首次随机化分析显示,与mFOLFIRINOX相比,术前PAXG在可切除和边缘可切除PDAC中表现出统计学和临床上有意义的无事件生存期改善。毒性较大,但两组之间大致相当。在等待总生存期、手术结局和患者报告结局数据的情况下,术前PAXG代表了一个有前景的新辅助治疗选择,可能成为未来试验中的适当对照方案。

资助和试验注册

该研究由MyEverest和Codice Viola资助。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04793932;EudraCT 2020-003080-26和2024-519031-42-00。

选定参考文献

1. Reni M, Macchini M, Orsi G, et al. Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX versus PAXG for stage I–III resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PACT-21 CASSANDRA): results of the first randomisation analysis of a randomized, open-label, 2 × 2 factorial phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2025 Nov 20: S0140-6736(25)01685-X. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01685-X. PMID: 41275879.

2. Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2395–2406. (PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA.6)

3. van Tienhoven G, Versteijne E, Suker M, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC): long-term results of a randomized, controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1090–1101.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply