Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Promising New Therapy for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Promising New Therapy for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Highlight

  • Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) significantly reduces facial erythema and flushing in patients with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR).
  • taVNS also improves systemic symptoms including anxiety, depression, insomnia, fatigue, and facial migraine.
  • Clinical benefits persist for 24 weeks after only a 3-week treatment course.
  • The therapy is well tolerated with minimal, mild adverse events.

Study Background: Clinical Context and Unmet Needs in Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory dermatologic condition that predominantly affects the central face. Among its subtypes, erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) is characterized by persistent facial erythema, prominent visible blood vessels (telangiectasias), and frequent flushing episodes. ETR can severely impair quality of life due to cosmetic concerns and associated neuropsychiatric comorbidities including anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances. Current treatments primarily focus on symptom management using topical agents, oral medications, and laser therapies, often requiring continuous administration and posing risks of side effects or incomplete relief. There remains an unmet need for novel, non-pharmacological, cost-effective therapies that provide sustained symptom control and address systemic manifestations.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a neuromodulation technique with anti-inflammatory and autonomic regulatory potential. Transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) noninvasively stimulates the auricular branch of the vagus nerve via the external ear, modulating inflammatory pathways and neuronal circuits. Previous studies have explored taVNS in conditions such as migraine and epilepsy, but its application in dermatologic diseases like ETR had not been systematically evaluated until recently.

Study Design and Methodology

This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial conducted in China from February to August 2024. The study enrolled 72 adult patients (mean age 29.5 years, 93.1% women) diagnosed with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea confirmed by Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) scores ≥ 2. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either active taVNS or sham stimulation.

The intervention group underwent daily transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation at 30 Hz frequency and 200 μs pulse width for 30 minutes per day, for 3 consecutive weeks. The control group received sham stimulation mimicking device application without effective nerve stimulation.

Primary endpoint was the change in CEA score after the 3-week treatment period. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported measures of erythema severity, facial flushing frequency and intensity, sleep quality, migraine frequency and severity, anxiety and depression scores, and fatigue levels. A 24-week post-treatment follow-up was performed to assess durability of responses. Safety outcomes were monitored through adverse event reporting.

Key Findings

After 3 weeks of treatment, the taVNS group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the primary outcome, with mean CEA scores decreasing by an average of 0.92 points compared to sham (P < .001). This reflects a meaningful clinical improvement in facial erythema.

Secondary outcomes revealed robust improvements with taVNS therapy versus sham across multiple systemic and skin-related symptoms:

  • Flushing severity mean difference (MD): -2.36 (P < .001)
  • Erythema MD: -0.97 (P < .001)
  • Anxiety score MD: -5.42 (P < .001)
  • Depression score MD: -6.22 (P < .001)
  • Insomnia severity MD: -7.93 (P < .001)
  • Fatigue MD: -17.77 (P = .002)
  • Facial migraine MD: -2.42 (P < .001)

The benefits noted at 3 weeks were sustained consistently throughout the 24-week follow-up, highlighting prolonged therapeutic effects after a short treatment course.

Regarding safety, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 5.6% of participants receiving taVNS and 8.3% in the sham group, all mostly mild and resolving spontaneously within 1–5 days, indicating a favorable tolerability profile.

Expert Commentary and Mechanistic Insights

The observed efficacy of taVNS likely arises from its modulatory effects on the autonomic nervous system and anti-inflammatory pathways. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines and enhances parasympathetic tone, potentially reducing neurogenic inflammation in rosacea. Improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms and fatigue further supports central nervous system modulation.

While this trial was rigorously designed, certain factors warrant consideration. The study population was predominantly young women, which may limit broad generalizability. Additionally, the single-center setting and 24-week follow-up, though noteworthy, call for confirmation in larger, multicenter cohorts with longer-term assessments.

Importantly, the sham control strengthens confidence in true efficacy beyond placebo, a critical benchmark in neuromodulation research. Future work may explore optimization of stimulation parameters and integration with existing therapies.

Conclusion

This randomized controlled trial provides compelling evidence that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is a novel, safe, and effective approach to managing erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. It not only ameliorates hallmark cutaneous symptoms such as erythema and flushing but also improves systemic comorbidities including anxiety, depression, insomnia, fatigue, and migraine.

The durable benefits observed 24 weeks post-treatment after only a 3-week stimulation course suggest taVNS could represent a cost-effective alternative or adjunct to conventional therapies. Given its noninvasive nature and favorable safety profile, taVNS holds promise for expanding therapeutic options in ETR, potentially transforming patient care by addressing both skin and psychoneurological aspects.

Further research is warranted to validate these findings across diverse populations, elucidate mechanistic pathways, and refine clinical protocols for vagus nerve-targeted neuromodulation in rosacea and related inflammatory skin diseases.

Reference

Li J, Wei J, Zhang M, Kong M, Xie L, Wan M, Pan Z, Tian J, Ou Z, Chen S, Xia A, Tang L, Song Z, Hou J, Hao F. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Treatment for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Oct 8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3796. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41060641.

经皮耳迷走神经刺激:治疗红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻的一种有前景的新疗法

经皮耳迷走神经刺激:治疗红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻的一种有前景的新疗法

亮点

  • 经皮耳迷走神经刺激 (taVNS) 显著减少了红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻 (ETR) 患者的面部红斑和潮红。
  • taVNS 还改善了系统性症状,包括焦虑、抑郁、失眠、疲劳和面部偏头痛。
  • 临床益处持续24周,仅需3周的治疗疗程。
  • 该疗法耐受性良好,仅有轻微的不良事件。

研究背景:红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻的临床背景和未满足的需求

酒渣鼻是一种主要影响面部中央区域的慢性炎症性皮肤病。在其亚型中,红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻 (ETR) 的特征是持续性面部红斑、明显的可见血管(毛细血管扩张)和频繁的潮红发作。ETR 可严重影响生活质量,因为其美容问题和相关的神经精神共病,如焦虑、抑郁和睡眠障碍。目前的治疗主要集中在使用外用药物、口服药物和激光疗法来管理症状,通常需要连续给药,并可能带来副作用或不完全缓解的风险。因此,仍需开发新型、非药物、成本效益高的治疗方法,以提供持久的症状控制并解决系统性表现。

迷走神经刺激 (VNS) 已作为一种具有抗炎和自主调节潜力的神经调节技术出现。经皮耳迷走神经刺激 (taVNS) 通过外耳非侵入性地刺激迷走神经的耳支,调节炎症途径和神经回路。此前的研究已探索了 taVNS 在偏头痛和癫痫等疾病中的应用,但其在皮肤疾病如 ETR 中的应用直到最近才得到系统评估。

研究设计与方法

这是一项在中国进行的单中心、随机、双盲、假对照临床试验,时间为2024年2月至8月。研究纳入了72名成年患者(平均年龄29.5岁,93.1%为女性),经临床红斑评估 (CEA) 评分 ≥ 2 确诊为红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻。参与者按1:1的比例随机分配接受活性 taVNS 或假刺激。

干预组每天进行30分钟的经皮耳迷走神经刺激,频率为30 Hz,脉冲宽度为200 μs,持续3周。对照组接受模拟设备应用但无有效神经刺激的假刺激。

主要终点是在3周治疗期后的 CEA 评分变化。次要结局包括患者报告的红斑严重程度、面部潮红频率和强度、睡眠质量、偏头痛频率和严重程度、焦虑和抑郁评分以及疲劳水平。进行了24周的治疗后随访以评估反应的持久性。通过不良事件报告监测安全性结果。

关键发现

经过3周的治疗后,taVNS 组的主要结局指标显示出统计学上的显著减少,平均 CEA 评分下降了0.92分,而假刺激组则没有显著变化(P < .001)。这反映了面部红斑的有意义的临床改善。

次要结局显示,与假刺激相比,taVNS 治疗在多个系统性和皮肤相关症状方面表现出显著改善:

  • 潮红严重程度均差 (MD): -2.36 (P < .001)
  • 红斑 MD: -0.97 (P < .001)
  • 焦虑评分 MD: -5.42 (P < .001)
  • 抑郁评分 MD: -6.22 (P < .001)
  • 失眠严重程度 MD: -7.93 (P < .001)
  • 疲劳 MD: -17.77 (P = .002)
  • 面部偏头痛 MD: -2.42 (P < .001)

在3周时观察到的益处在24周的随访期内持续存在,突显了短期治疗后的长期疗效。

关于安全性,5.6% 接受 taVNS 治疗的参与者和8.3% 接受假刺激的参与者发生了治疗引起的不良事件,所有事件均为轻度且在1-5天内自行缓解,表明其耐受性良好。

专家评论和机制见解

观察到的 taVNS 效力可能源于其对自主神经系统和抗炎途径的调节作用。迷走神经刺激抑制促炎细胞因子并增强副交感神经张力,可能减少酒渣鼻中的神经源性炎症。神经精神症状和疲劳的改善进一步支持了中枢神经系统调节的作用。

尽管这项试验设计严谨,但仍需考虑某些因素。研究人群主要为年轻女性,这可能限制了广泛推广。此外,单中心设置和24周的随访,尽管值得注意,但仍需在更大规模的多中心队列中进行验证,并进行更长时间的评估。

重要的是,假对照增强了对真正效力的信心,这是神经调节研究中的一个关键基准。未来的工作可能探讨优化刺激参数并将其与现有疗法结合。

结论

这项随机对照试验提供了令人信服的证据,表明经皮耳迷走神经刺激是一种治疗红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻的新颖、安全和有效的手段。它不仅减轻了红斑和潮红等标志性皮肤症状,还改善了焦虑、抑郁、失眠、疲劳和偏头痛等系统性共病。

在仅3周的刺激疗程后,24周的持久益处表明 taVNS 可能成为传统疗法的经济有效的替代或辅助治疗。鉴于其非侵入性和良好的安全性,taVNS 在 ETR 中具有扩展治疗选择的潜力,通过解决皮肤和心理神经方面的双重问题,有望改变患者护理方式。

进一步的研究有必要在不同人群中验证这些发现,阐明机制途径,并完善针对迷走神经的神经调节在酒渣鼻及相关炎症性皮肤病中的临床方案。

参考文献

Li J, Wei J, Zhang M, Kong M, Xie L, Wan M, Pan Z, Tian J, Ou Z, Chen S, Xia A, Tang L, Song Z, Hou J, Hao F. 经皮耳迷走神经刺激治疗红斑毛细血管扩张性酒渣鼻:一项随机临床试验。JAMA Dermatol. 2025 年 10 月 8 日。doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3796. Epub 提前出版。PMID: 41060641.

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Novel Approach to Managing Postpartum Uterine Contraction Pain after Cesarean Delivery

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: A Novel Approach to Managing Postpartum Uterine Contraction Pain after Cesarean Delivery

Highlight

• Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) dramatically decreases the incidence of moderate to severe postpartum uterine contraction pain following elective cesarean delivery.
• taVNS reduces both incisional pain and psychological sequelae including postpartum depression and anxiety.
• Patients receiving taVNS experienced significantly better recovery quality and sleep quality in the immediate postoperative period.
• This noninvasive, safe technique may represent a novel adjunct for enhanced postpartum pain management and recovery facilitation.

Study Background and Disease Burden

Postpartum uterine contraction pain is a prevalent and distressing condition among women in the early puerperium after delivery, especially after cesarean sections. This pain arises from intermittent strong uterine contractions as the uterus involutes to its pre-pregnancy size. While often under-recognized, severe uterine contraction pain substantially diminishes maternal well-being, impairs mobility, and may interfere with mother-infant bonding and breastfeeding. Conventional analgesics often provide incomplete relief or come with potential side effects, creating an unmet need for safe, effective, and nonpharmacological alternatives for pain control in this vulnerable population.

Neuromodulation techniques, including transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), have garnered interest due to their analgesic and anxiolytic properties. The auricular branch of the vagus nerve offers an accessible peripheral entry point to modulate central pain pathways noninvasively. taVNS has demonstrated efficacy in various acute and chronic pain syndromes, but its application for postpartum uterine contraction pain remains understudied.

Study Design

This randomized clinical trial conducted at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, China, enrolled 156 women aged 18 years or older scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 allocation to receive either active taVNS or sham taVNS interventions. The treatment consisted of 30-minute stimulation sessions once daily on the day of surgery and postoperative days 1 and 2.

The primary endpoint was the incidence of moderate to severe postpartum uterine contraction pain (defined as a visual analogue scale [VAS] score ≥4) on postoperative day 3. Secondary endpoints included peak uterine contraction and incision pain scores, assessment of postpartum anxiety and depression using validated scales (PRAQ-R2 and EPDS respectively), recovery quality evaluated by ObsQoR-11, and sleep quality measured by the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ).

Key Findings

The trial demonstrated a marked reduction in the incidence of moderate to severe uterine contraction pain in the active taVNS group, with only 5.1% (4 of 78) reporting moderate to severe pain compared with 28.2% (22 of 78) in the sham group. This corresponded to a relative risk reduction of 82% (relative risk 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.50; P < .001).

Furthermore, the median VAS score for incisional pain on postoperative day 3 was significantly lower in the taVNS group (2.20; interquartile range [IQR], 2.00–2.50) compared to the sham group (3.00; IQR, 2.60–3.33). Such a reduction in pain intensity can meaningfully improve patient comfort and mobility.

Psychological outcomes also favored the taVNS group: the median Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score was 3.00 (IQR, 2.00–4.00) versus 5.00 (IQR, 3.00–6.00) in controls, and anxiety scores measured by the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised 2 (PRAQ-R2) were also lower at 13.50 (IQR, 12.00–15.00) versus 15.00 (IQR, 13.75–17.00), indicating better psychological well-being.

Quality of recovery, as measured by the ObsQoR-11 score on postoperative day 3, was superior in the active group with a median of 104 (IQR, 103–105), compared with 99 (IQR, 96–101) in the sham group. Similarly, sleep quality on postoperative day 2 was significantly better with taVNS (LSEQ score median 52.00, IQR 50.00–55.00) versus sham (47.50, IQR 43.00–52.00), highlighting improved rest and recuperation.

Importantly, the intervention was well tolerated with no reported adverse effects attributable to taVNS, underscoring its safety profile as a noninvasive analgesic option for postpartum women.

Expert Commentary

These findings are particularly significant in the realm of postpartum care where nonpharmacological options for pain relief are highly desirable to minimize opioid use and associated risks in breastfeeding mothers. The favorable impact of taVNS on both somatic pain and psychological distress aligns with the known modulatory effects of vagus nerve stimulation on neuroimmune pathways, nociceptive processing, and mood regulation. Although these results are promising, further studies are warranted to explore the long-term benefits, optimal stimulation parameters, and applicability across diverse populations.

One limitation is the relatively short follow-up confined to the immediate postoperative period; extended evaluation could determine if benefits persist or influence longer-term postpartum recovery milestones. Additionally, study replication in broader clinical settings would support generalizability.

Conclusion

This rigorously conducted randomized clinical trial provides compelling evidence that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is an effective, safe, and noninvasive strategy to significantly reduce postpartum uterine contraction pain and incisional pain following cesarean delivery. Beyond analgesia, taVNS contributes to improved psychological outcomes, recovery quality, and sleep, marking it as a promising tool in multimodal postpartum care. Incorporation of taVNS could enhance patient comfort and satisfaction, reduce reliance on systemic analgesics, and foster better overall postpartum recovery.

Future research should aim to clarify mechanisms, refine treatment protocols, evaluate cost-effectiveness, and assess integration into postpartum clinical pathways worldwide.

References

1. Xiong X, Tao M, Zhao W, et al. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Postpartum Contraction Pain During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(8):e2529127. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29127.
2. Farmer AD, et al. Neuromodulation in pain and mood disorders: Vagus nerve stimulation and beyond. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(8):531–543.
3. Starkweather AR, et al. Mechanisms of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Pain Reduction and Mood Regulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):642.
4. Dennis CL, et al. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: a review of the validation studies. J Psychosom Res. 2005;58(2):315-323.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *